CDC wants to inject BABIES with COVID-19 shots – but they aren’t licensed for kids under 12

09/11/2024 / By Ava Grace

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) wants babies to get doses of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine. However, no COVID-19 vaccine is licensed for children under the age of 12.

According to the public health agency’s guidance issued on Aug. 30, children as young as six months old should get injected with either two doses of the 2024-2025 Moderna COVID-19 vaccine or three doses of the 2024-2025 Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.

For the latest Moderna injection, the CDC recommends that babies get the first dose at six months and the second dose a month after the first. For the latest Pfizer shot, the agency advises that the first dose should be given at six months. The second dose should be given three weeks after the first, and the third dose should be given at least eight weeks after the second.

Following the CDC’s guidance, nine-month-old babies must have been injected with the COVID-19 vaccine to be considered “up to date” with their vaccination. But the problem is that both the latest versions of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are not licensed for use on children under 12. This is because the Food and Drug Administration only granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for the new vaccines.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) CEO Mary Holland remarked that the CDC is “absolutely misleading” the public by asserting that COVID-19 vaccines granted EUA are safe and effective. This is because EUA vaccines are not held to the same safety or efficacy standards as licensed vaccines.

“By law, EUA products ‘may be effective’ and they have not undergone the safety testing required to permit licensing. This is one more horrific example of the CDC putting profits before people and acting as an unethical arm of Big Pharma’s marketing operation,” she said.

“The earlier COVID-19 shots have been proven unsafe and ineffective. Now we’re asked to believe that newer versions are miraculously safe and effective?”

CDC still defends COVID-19 vaccines as “safe and effective”

According to the CDC, “the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the known risks of COVID-19 and possible severe complications.”

But Brian Hooker, CHD’s chief scientific officer, begged to differ. He pointed to research showing the dangers of vaccine induced myocarditis (heart muscle inflammation) and pericarditis (heart lining inflammation).

“It is criminal that these untested vaccines are being recommended to infants and children, especially given the fraudulent tactics to market them to an unsuspecting public,” Hooker said. He stressed that there are still no licensed COVID-19 vaccines available for children under 12, so all COVID-19 injections given to young children are EUA products.

The Defender explained that if a parent takes her children to get injected with the COVID-19 vaccine, her 12-year old could receive the fully licensed one. Meanwhile, her 11-year-old must get injected with the unlicensed COVID-19 vaccines available only under EUA.

Hooker described the CDC’s actions as problematic given that historically, regulatory authorities have interpreted the meaning of “safe” as the benefits outweighing the risks. He continued: “With the risk to children of dying from a COVID-19 infection being statistically zero, it is unclear if there is any benefit.”

Holland ultimately concluded that the CDC’s new guidance is an insult to people’s intelligence. “I pray that parents will have the good sense to say no to these dangerous and unnecessary shots for babies,” she said.

Watch this video about the numerous post-vaccination deaths from heart issues in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

This video is from the Iconoclast channel on Brighteon.com.